- Claire Walker

- Feb 28
- 4 min read
Updated: Feb 28
I am not creative.
I cannot problem solve.
Experimenting? No thanks.
I consider myself to be; inquisitive. persistent. collaborative. disciplined. imaginative.

Laughter echoes through the clinical walls of the staff common room.
“You are so creative!"
“I wish I was creative”
What is creativity anyway?
Creativity has gained international prominence in educational research, policy, and practice¹ because of its ongoing contribution to economic growth and industrial innovation.² In the Australian context, developing ‘creative and confident citizens’ is the second of two key goals of the Alice Springs (Mparntwe) Education Declaration.³ The purpose of these goals is to ‘prepare young people to thrive in a time of rapid social and technological change, and complex environmental, social and economic challenges’ (p. 2). This goal is reflected in Australia’s national curriculum, where ‘Critical and Creative Thinking’ is situated as a general capability to be taught and assessed across key learning areas from Foundation to Year 10.
Creativity, beneath the careful gaze of researchers, is no longer limited to the artistic domain; rather, it is a multidimensional construct substantiated as a complex array of dispositions residing in all individuals.⁴
Seeking a concise definition of creativity, Runco and Jaeger (2012) propose that ‘originality is vital for creativity but is not sufficient’ (P. 92), advocating that a creative product is the efficient fusion between originality and task appropriateness. Elaborating on this, Glaveanu and Begetto (2021) argue that ‘novelty and meaningfulness [of a product] are not sufficient for characterising the creative experience’ (p.75), contending that creativity extends beyond the creative product, and is an experiential phenomenon emerging from the way an individual interacts with the world. Contributing to a working definition of creativity, they suggest that ‘the creative experience’ (p. 76) is characterised by (1) openness: embracing new views and perspectives to enhance adaptability and flexibility, (2) non-linearity: shifting cognitive processes from what is - to what might be, (3) pluri-perspectivism: inviting others to apply new meaning, values, and interpretations to a creative piece, and (4) future-orientation: letting future possibilities influence actions and interactions.
Expanding interdisciplinary creativity beyond the physical into the digital world, Runco (2023) offers a definition in response to artificial intelligence (AI), proposing the need for authenticity and intentionality to distinguish authentic creativity from artificial creativity. Through the presented literature, definitional creativity has considered the creative outcome,⁵ the creative experience and environment ⁶ , and the creative individual.

Creativity extends beyond the arts?
oh.
"Well. I was always good at thinking flexibly in mathematics..."
and "considering new possibilities in science..."
and "conjoining on-set and rhyme for poetic purposes..."
Does that mean I am creative?
An identity in Christ
“So God created mankind in his own image, in the image of God he created them; male and female he created them.”
In a society where identity is as fluid as an uncontrolled flood, breaking through riverbanks, scripture provides an embankment that provides perspective, reason, and truth. As Christians, we have been created in likeness to God. Fearfully and wonderfully made, we have been designed to reflect the characteristics of Jesus himself.
That’s correct. Creativity is a sophisticated and marvellous feature of who God is and who we are. Creativity has boundaries that guide task appropriateness, originality, and authenticity. Scripture has boundaries that guide righteousness, identity, and purpose. These boundaries do not constrain, rather they provide a wondrous hierarchical system of rivers and streams, interconnected tributaries, that offer a sophisticated network of direction and connection.
“For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him.”
Parting Words
So, having faithful certainty in who God created us to be, as we are sanctified daily, we can remember that as Christian Educators we are creative. You are creative. I am creative.
Therefore, the young adults, teenagers, and children that we teach, must also be perceived in the same way. Each young person has the potential to be creative. Creativity can be learned. It is not merely a genetic feature that some individuals have and some don’t. Our students are and can be creative.
For His glory,
Claire Walker
Sing to him a new song; play skilfully, and shout for joy.
Main Reference: MY THESIS - Click the link to read or download below xx
Footnotes:
Holinger et al., 2024; Long et al., 2022; Moger & Bagley, 2019
Harris & Ammermann, 2016; McWilliam & Haukka, 2008
Australian Government, 2019
OECD, 2023b
Runco & Jaeger, 2012
Glaveanu & Begetto, 2021
References:
Australian Government. (2019). Alice Springs (Mparntwe) Education Declaration. Australian
Government.Retrieved from https://www.education.gov.au/alice-springs-mparntwe-education-declaration/resources/alice-springs-mparntwe-education-declaration
Glaveanu, V. P., & Begetto, R. A. (2021). Creative experience: A non-standard definition of
creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 33(2), 75-80.
Harris, A. M., & de Bruin, L. (2019). Creative Ecologies and Education Futures. In C. A. Mullen (Ed.), Creativity under Duress in Education? Resistive Theories, Practices, and Actions (pp.99-115). Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90272-2
Holinger, M., Boldt, G. T., & Kaufman, J. C. (2024). Recent Trends in Creativity Research: An
Analysis of Keywords in Four Prominent Creativity Journals. Creativity Research Journal, 1-
Long, H., Kerr, B. A., Emler, T. E., & Birdnow, M. (2022). A Critical Review of Assessments of
Creativity in Education. Review of Research in Education, 46(1), 288-323.
McWilliam, E., & Haukka, S. (2008). Educating the creative workforce: New directions for twenty‐first century schooling. British Educational Research Journal, 34(5), 651-666.
Moger, P., & Bagley, C. (2019). A space for policy legacy: an ethnographic exploration of a
secondary school's commitment to creativity after national policy priorities have changed.
Ethnography and Education, 14(1), 101-118. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457823.2017.1396544
OECD. (2023). Student assessment. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/sub-issues/student-assessment.html
Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92-96. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.650092
Runco, M. A. (2023). Updating the standard definition of creativity to account for the artificial creativity of AI. Creativity Research Journal, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2023.2257977




















